Julius Caesar: Brutus as a Tragic Character

If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Julius Caesar: Brutus as a Tragic Character. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Julius Caesar: Brutus as a Tragic Character paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Julius Caesar: Brutus as a Tragic Character, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Julius Caesar: Brutus as a Tragic Character paper at affordable prices with writing help service!

JULIUS CAESAR by Brian Sia

William Wallace, is one of the most renowned freedom fighters in history. However, his arrogance was his most fatal threat. He thought he could go up against King Edward's forces, but his army was decimated during the battle of Falkirk. No man is perfect. With every great man comes an even greater flaw. Marcus Brutus is no exception. He is what Shakespeare called a "tragic character" a central character who possesses a critical flaw, and inevitably, meets his downfall.

Brutus' primary flaw is most certainly his undying love for his country, Rome. He would go to any lengths "if it be aught toward the general good" (p.1), no matter the consequences, even if it means taking his own life, or the life of his best and most loyal friend. Upon considering the idea of joining the conspiracy, he claims that he is willing to "set honour in one eye, and death i' th' other…..and look on both indifferently" (p.1). Unlike Cassius and the other conspirators, Brutus' intentions to kill Caesar are not related to jealousy, authority, money or respect. He honestly believes that when Caesar is crowned, he will abuse his power, and therefore, become a serious threat to Rome. ("I know no personal cause to spurn at him, but for the general. He would be crown'd how that might change his nature" P.4).

Brutus compares Caesar to "a serpent's egg, which, hatch'd, would, as his kind, grow mischievous", and that he must be stopped at all costs before he is unleashed. Brutus believes that he can free his country from tyranny and bring liberty back to Rome. It is this extreme patriotism that forces Brutus to join the conspiracy and murder his best friend. As Brutus explains his actions to the people, he says that it was "not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (p.7). In the end, it is this sheer loyalty and devotion to his country that vanquishes the honourable Brutus. You could even consider Brutus a martyr, as he stood ready to surrender his life for Rome. ("As I slew my best lover for the good of Rome, I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please my country to need my death" p.80).

Essay help on Julius Caesar: Brutus as a Tragic Character

This everlasting faithfulness for his nation can be traced back to Brutus' idealistic and stubborn nature. Once he has set his sights on something, he will never turn back. Brutus' dogmatic character is clearly evident when he refuses to tell his noble and trustworthy wife about the conspiracy. He has decided that it be best for her not to know of the terrible secrets he is harbouring, despite her pleads and requests "Within the bonds of marriage, tell me, Brutus, it is expected that I know no secrets" (p.48) and "Giving myself a voluntary wound, here, in the thigh can I bear that with patience, and not my husband's secrets" (p.4).

Furthermore, when he is plotting with the conspirators, Brutus discards all of the other's suggestions as he believes he is right, and he won't take no for an answer, even though they are the ones who seem to be thinking clearly. In response to including the influential Cicero, Brutus' claims that "he will never follow any thing that other men begin", and in reply to assassinating Mark Antony, he says that their "cause will seem too bloody" (p.4). This becomes perhaps the most devastating flaw in the plans of the conspirators, and also in Brutus' character. He claims that Mark Antony "can do no more than Caesar's arm when Caesar's head is off" (p.4), however, here is where Brutus is utterly mistaken. Brutus believes that once they have slaughtered Julius Caesar, the people of Rome will see their noble cause, and they will not be branded traitors, but glorious heroes. Once Brutus believes something, he will see it through until the end. He is so confident he would march along the streets, his hands bathed in blood, crying out "Peace, freedom and liberty!" (p.6). Brutus claims that they should "kill him boldly" and "carve him up as a dish fit for the gods" (p.4), as if slaying Caesar would please the heavens. ("Our reasons are so full of good regard, that were you, Antony, the son of Caesar, you should be satisfied" p.74).

It is these two flaws that make Brutus blind to see his final lethal flaw that he is actually very gullible and easily persuaded. Right from the beginning Cassius is aware of this and takes advantage of Brutus through his susceptible nature. "Like a Colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs, and peep about to find ourselves dishonourable graves" (p.15), says Cassius to manipulate Brutus, and make him see things from his point of view. Next he uses flattery, claiming they are the "underlings" even though the name "'Brutus' will start up a spirit as soon as 'Caesar'". "Caesar…..why should that name be sounded more than yours? Write them together, yours is a fair name…..weigh them, it is as heavy", Cassius continues as he gradually corrupts the mighty and most noble Brutus, who is oblivious to all this.

Mark Antony also manages to deceive Brutus with his persuasive words. ("Friends I am with you all, and love you all, upon this hope that you shall give me reasons why, and wherein, Caesar was dangerous" p.74). He too uses flattery, claiming that he "shall not love Caesar dead so well as Brutus living; but will follow the fortunes and affairs of the noble Brutus…with all true faith". Of course, he is simply flattering Brutus, and later betrays him by turning the people of Rome against the conspirators and brands them as traitors.

So you see, every man, no matter how great, has his flaws. Even the most honourable and noble Brutus, whose sole purpose and beliefs were to serve Rome, became a tragic character. Identical to William Wallace, Brutus gave his life in support of his country and ultimately, came to his demise, regardless of his eternal love for Rome, its people, and the "general good".

Please note that this sample paper on Julius Caesar: Brutus as a Tragic Character is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Julius Caesar: Brutus as a Tragic Character, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on Julius Caesar: Brutus as a Tragic Character will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from writing help service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Montana 1948 EssayMaturity

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Montana 1948 EssayMaturity. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Montana 1948 EssayMaturity paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Montana 1948 EssayMaturity, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Montana 1948 EssayMaturity paper at affordable prices!

may come at any age and time in a person's life. One moment he or she may be a carefree child, and then suddenly realize that they have been transformed into a mature adult by a powerful and traumatic experience. An experience they will remember their whole lives. In To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, the adolescence of Jem and Scout is threatened one fateful night by a dangerous man bent on taking their lives. After this startling experience, they were never the same again. As a result, they rapidly matured into adults. Similarly, young David Hayden, the narrator of Montana 148 by Larry Watson, also encounters an equally traumatic event. He discovers that his uncle has been sexually assaulting Native American women in his town. This is a heavy burden for a twelve year old boy, especially since it reveals that his beloved Uncle Frank is the bad-guy. However, one discovers, as the novel develops, that David matures and grows in order to deal with this situation. He must come to understand what has happened and how the immoral actions of Frank will affect his family and its name. But most importantly, he must know that his integrity will be changed. He will learn shocking things that would mean nothing to a child, but everything to an adult. Larry Watson suggests that traumatic experiences transform children into adults. Therefore, disturbing experiences lead to changes of mind, growth in morals, and an emerging sense of adulthood. David changes his mind about Uncle Frank through the traumatic experiences regarding the discovery of Frank's secret actions. Uncle Frank used to be David's idol and David adored him. But that all changed when David's housekeeper and baby sitter, Marie Little Soldier, becomes violently ill and is in need of a doctor. Wes Hayden, David's father, calls his brother Frank, who is the town doctor, to come and see her. Strangely enough, Marie Little Soldier refuses to be alone in the room with Frank. Later on, Marie tells David's mother horrible things that Frank has been doing to Native American women. David's mother, Gail, tells Wes as David overhears. She says, 'Wesley, your brother has been raping these women. These girls. These Indian girls…' [David states] I was beginning already to think of Uncle Frank as a criminal…Charming, affable Uncle Frank was gone for good (47, 4). David always thought goodly of his uncle, until he heard these ghastly statements. All the attractiveness and appeal of Frank dissipated once David learned of his filthy behavior. David knew this information would change him forever. He takes another step toward adulthood by hearing and understanding what his uncle has done. David also knows that his opinion of Frank is changing. Young David Hayden grows in morals due to the shocking events of the summer of 148. Consequently, David learns a great lesson about morals from all the episodes that occur. Marie is found dead a few days after Frank goes in to see her. Frank claims she died of pneumonia. David's next door neighbor, Daisy McAuley, goes to their house to comfort Gail. Daisy treats David maternally and wants him to leave the scene of the crime. So she tell him to go over to her house and have a piece of pie. While he's there, David encounters the deputy sheriff, Len McAuley. Len is drunk and reveals the fact that he thought he saw Frank walking into David's house a little while before Marie was found dead. David discloses this and the fact that, he too, saw Frank. David confesses to his parents, …While I was sitting there I saw someone cutting across our backyard. There's a knothole you can see out of. I was pretty sure it was Uncle Frank. Then I got out and watched him go down the tracks. He was going toward town… (7). After receiving the shock of knowing his uncle is a fiend, David experiences a growth in morality. He chooses to tell his parents what he knows, or at least part of what he knows, about Uncle Frank. This shows that he is developing in the area of honesty. Before, David would have kept all this to himself, rather than face his parents with knowledge he knows will displease them.Through dreadful experiences, David feels an emerging sense of adulthood. David and his parents are not on good terms with David's grandparents because Wes locked Frank in his basement. Julian, David's grandfather, is very unhappy that Wes would lock up his own brother despite the fact that Wes saves Frank the humiliation of going to jail. David faces an even more intimidating threat when he notices that a few of the hired hands from his grandfather's ranch come to his house to try and break Frank free. He comments, These men must have figured, with Grandpa's help, that Frank was in the basement, and that rear door was the way they were going in after him… (1). David is close to being an adult because he realizes how he must act and the gravity of the situation in which he and his family are involved. By now, David has issued forth a sense of development and maturity. He is far from the child who once looked forward to visits from his uncle and visits to his grandfather's ranch. As an adult, he is concerned with the welfare of his family and his parents' well being, emotionally. David exemplifies this and stands by his family when they are in need. He does not desert them or feel shameful. He stays loyal and true to those he cares for and loves. Thus, he has shown his ability to act as an adult would. One can never be too sure when the innocence of childhood is lost, the sure thing is that everyone becomes an adult eventually, and that's when they lose their innocence. In many cases, this change from child to adult is a harsh one, often it is the realization that the world is not perfect. The shootings at Columbine is just one example. Those children were faced with the severe reality that death does not apply only to older people, but to anyone in the world. This revelation caused many of them to cease their immaturity and become an adult. And it was a very difficult task for many of them. One must be careful for corruption rears its ugly head where you least expect it. The loss of innocence signifies a person's metamorphosis from a child to an adult. Therefore, it is the events and happenings in life that trigger this change.

Please note that this sample paper on Montana 1948 EssayMaturity is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Montana 1948 EssayMaturity, we are here to assist you. Your on Montana 1948 EssayMaturity will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Topic: "We feel for Griet, who glimpses possibilities beyond her limited life, but is condemned never to reach them." Discuss.

If you order your cheap essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Topic: "We feel for Griet, who glimpses possibilities beyond her limited life, but is condemned never to reach them." Discuss.. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Topic: "We feel for Griet, who glimpses possibilities beyond her limited life, but is condemned never to reach them." Discuss. paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Topic: "We feel for Griet, who glimpses possibilities beyond her limited life, but is condemned never to reach them." Discuss., therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Topic: "We feel for Griet, who glimpses possibilities beyond her limited life, but is condemned never to reach them." Discuss. paper at affordable prices with writing help service!

The drama of the novel Girl with a pearl earring, centers around the tension created between what people want and what is permitted, especially when it comes to the main character, Griet. She is very much 'bound' because of her lower class and poverty. Chevalier has skillfully brought to life an imagined character, whose situation and behaviour are quite true to the novel's historical setting. Griet suffers considerably, in a number of ways (in which we feel for her), including her being forced to go into service because of her family's poverty, her being mistreated in the Vermeer household, her being looked down on despite her obvious abilities knowing that if she follows her instincts with the artist she will be damned, and so on. Although Griet suffers a great deal of unfairness, she develops throughout the novel and learns to deal with the situation she is dealt.

Griet is illiterate and comes from a poor family. The truth is she never really had the option of being categorized as a 'lady', the term given to the wife or daughter of a rich man. In that era, Griet was limited to doing only the domestic work that every girl would have learnt in the home. She has no career prospects. She has only one seemingly 'escape' route, that being Pieter and his willingness to marry and provide for her. She is also being pressed to accept Pieter as a suitor, despite the fact that she doesn't want him. This is because she is her family's only hope for a more comfortable life. After all, "a butcher's wife- and her parents- would always eat well". Thus, we feel for her, as she isn't able to live outside this square that is her life's limits.

Griet's involvement with the master Vermeer (whether emotional or artistic), leads to the creation of a very insightful Griet one that, in another time, might have been an artist too. After all, her father is a tile maker and she has an intuitive visual sense too. However, the unfairness of Griet not being able to realize her potential is again emphasized. She feels she should not help the master because doing so would heighten Catharina's jealousy, a woman that holds power over Griet. This girl possesses a high degree of intelligence, often pointing things out to Vermeer, even moving things around so that the composition of the painting becomes "balanced". All of this advice Vermeer accepts. She has a keen eye, firstly seen in the opening chapter of the book, where she places the chopped vegetables in a neat colour wheel. No wonder Maria Thins refers to her as a "clever girl". However, the distress of this restriction (that she cannot pursue this interest further) is additionally sharpened by our and her realization that she is this clever, artistically gifted girl. She is allowed to glimpse the rich world of art and work alongside a great master like Vermeer, but she is then forced to go her own way condemned never to reach her artistic desires.

Van Leeuwenhoek can see the potential in Griet and hence urges her to remain herself, to not get so lost in the world of Vermeer, who "sees the world only as he wants it to be, not as it is." Vermeer changes Griet; he makes her think she may have a chance. He turns her into that 'lady', from the moment he mentions her wearing the pearls. He cares more for the painting of Griet rather than her own person. She realizes this and thinks Vermeer has "ruined her." The secret portrait of Griet is symbolically giving her to the rich man, van Rujiven, in return for the money the artist makes, and van Rujiven's continuing patronage. There is no hint whatsoever in the text that Vermeer was even thinking about giving up his wife, his family, his link to society through his art, just so he could be with Griet. He saw himself as much too much of a respected member of community to do so. Their liaison, the course of her painting, could never be more than a man and his mistress relationship- and not even that, seeing as Vermeer was surrounded by a household of women, and possessed little money himself. That leaves only a dalliance between the two, and one as much of the mind as the body. The painting being finished, Griet begins to "cry silently". She knows what has happened that she has had a glimpse into possibilities beyond her limited life, she has had a taste of them, but she will never be permitted to reach them. For that, we feel for her. She returns to the eight-pointed star and ponders her options. There was only one option there that was truly possible for her to undertake it was the "choice she knew she had to make."

Cheap research paper on Topic: "We feel for Griet, who glimpses possibilities beyond her limited life, but is condemned never to reach them." Discuss.

Life for Griet throughout the course of this novel could be debated as being unfair indeed, she is condemned to never reach the possibilities which she glimpses that are beyond her limited life. However, note that she emerges intact and well taken care of. She is pretty, made to live forever in a painting, married to a prosperous merchant, her brush with notoriety forgotten, with two boys and no fear of hunger. In comparison to poor Tanneke and the widow Catharina, she has come out of this the victor. Griet chose the only way open to her, as would have been open to any similar girl living during that time. She chose the safety of a marriage to a man who loved her. She chose the socially acceptable role of wife and mother. Any other path chosen would have jeopardized her reputation, with the potential of leaving her a "fallen woman". While we feel for Griet never being able to enter those possibilities she dreamt of, we find solace in that deep down, given her circumstances, we knew she would never reach them and rejoice because she has made the most of her situation.Please note that this sample paper on Topic: "We feel for Griet, who glimpses possibilities beyond her limited life, but is condemned never to reach them." Discuss. is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Topic: "We feel for Griet, who glimpses possibilities beyond her limited life, but is condemned never to reach them." Discuss., we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom research papers on Topic: "We feel for Griet, who glimpses possibilities beyond her limited life, but is condemned never to reach them." Discuss. will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from writing help service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Reparations for Slavery

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Reparations for Slavery. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Reparations for Slavery paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Reparations for Slavery, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Reparations for Slavery paper at affordable prices!

This paper touches on points made between four lawyers in the discussion on how it would be possible to get reparations for slavery. Is reparations for Blacks plausible? Does statement in their discussion have credence in the court of law, or is it merely just outcome over process? Views coming from Robert H. Bork (author of The Tempting America) and Stanley Fish (author of the trouble with Principle), will also be covered to agree or disagree with statements made in the Harper articles.

These four lawyers (Willie Gary, Alexander Pires, Richard Scruggs, Dennis Sweet) have come together to discuss to find a way to get reparation for African Americans for not only just slavery but also the affects slavery had on the Black population. Their first legal strategy is to file the case a simple lawsuit. After the war, former slaves were promised forty acres and a mule, and we never got it(Gary 57), and because of this they are trying to file this as a breach of contract case. The issue of statue of limitations arose but was quickly refuted by Sweet, Is an injustice no longer an injustice so long as you get away with it for a long time?(Sweet 58); which shows that Sweet is a lawyer who favors outcome over process. Im sure that Fish, being pro outcome, would be in support of Sweet and use the idea of his neutral principle to give him leverage on this issue

Which brings me to the thoughts of Stanley fish and his views on neutral principal. In his article he goes on talking about the myth of the neutral principle, and its impossibility for anyone to be absolutely neutral. For you to be neutral you need to be able to lay the groundwork of what the words equal signify. How can anyone make the decision of seeing if it would be fair to distribute goods equally irrespective of the accomplishments of those who receive them, or would it be fair to reward each according to his efforts(Fish )? This paradox clearly shows that you may achieve being fair by choosing either outcome, but by going to one side of the issue, you are being unfair to the other side, thus further implicating the myth of the neutral principle. It is because of the groundwork needed that one may use the idea of neutral principle in order to gain leverage or support for their cause, using this idea to support higher and deeper than the support provided by its own substantive thrust(40). These Lawyers arsenal for reparations will consist of the idea of fairness towards the Black community. Many politicians and judges use this concept to clarify that they made the right moral decision. Not one person can be truly impartial, the lives we lead have constructed certain bias in which we are comprised of and to attempt to become impartial is to deny our past and ourselves. Though judges try hard to work with the system and be impartial, it unrealistic for judges to use their morality in order to decide on an outcome in a court trial. Contrary to Borks views, Fish is all for putting the ends before the means.

Despite the fact that this would completely contradict Borks view of Process over outcome and the judicial systems strict adherence of the law. Throughout every court preceding, judges play a crucial roles; Bork believe that there are two types of judges. One who adheres to the theories of constitutional laws sought out by original understanding and the ones who dont, referred to as the revisionist theorist. His main quarrel with judges is their ability to, at any given court trial, make decisions on the outcome based on their own moral philosophy instead of referring to our Constitution. When the constitution was written it took into consideration moral philosophy and should be a guideline that all judges follow. One of the many flaws that Bork points out is that a moral philosophy necessarily rests upon a belief that not only is there a single correct moral theory, but in todays circumstances, all people of good will and moderate intelligence must accept the theory(Bork 6). Professional philosophers throughout time have deliberated over issues pertaining to law and morality, with the great minds of our planets history each giving their two cents and still not coming to even remotely close to agreeing; what makes a single judge possess the audacity to express his moral opinion as the one great mind to rule over all others. Even if there is a Judge as conceded enough to think that his word and moral belief will always be the correct one and is correct in assuming that; the impossibility of the public in themselves to agree on that judges decision is great. In every occasion in the short live years of our nations history the basic model is to place all disagreements to a vote. Democracy is how our country is labeled in all aspects except for that of a judges moral interjection. Bork further elaborates by discussing that even by the unimaginable chance that both the judge is correct morally and everyone agrees on it, "there would be no need for constitutional judges since legislation would embody the principal of that morality(7); basically meaning that if there is such a theory, it would be put into the Constitution and would not need any further amending on behalf of judges. Either way you look at it, whether you have both the judge with his neutral principles and public behind his position, or have neither; it leads you to the same conclusion of not needing judges decisions based on moral philosophy and their idea of neutral principal.

Though Bork may not agree with Garys first legal strategy, there may be a slim chance he may with the second, mainly because it involves pushing the judgment on congress and not the judges. The nd part of their game plan is to get a law suit against many huge corporations that Blacks help build, and those that denied blacks civil liberties from slavery days to the present day; while at the same time sue local, state, and federal governments. The idea is to get a national audience, which in turn will get a public outcry that can affect the way a judge is going to rule. It can make him not want to rule, it can make him hold and then perhaps Congress will step and you can talk settlement(Gary 64). This way Borks view on philosophical morality being push into laws by judges, will not be affected. How ever this would contradict his view on laws being undermined by moral philosophy. He is convinced that law is being seduced by politics and is thereby losing its integrity as a discipline(Bork 15). If this case is presented and reparations for thousand of Blacks are awarded, the basic meaning of the law(in this aspect) will be wiped away, and every group from all time periods that have been discriminated against will be in demand for their slice of the pie. What was originally a plan to help African American would then become a legal nightmare.

To sum up, Reparation in the form of money seem to be a ridiculous idea, though the lawyers are also trying to push for governmental programs to be initiated; but even then this is an absurd idea mainly because then every one else in our country will be looking for their fair share. With the exception of Pires who actually suggest to work pro bono, all of the other lawyers in the article are bloodsuckers waiting to take a bite out of cash cow. The opinions expressed by the Harper article for the most part do not have credence in the court room, but leave much in term of outcome. It is through this outcome that new laws have will continue to be forged despite those who disagree with it. Fortunately, the Harper Articles did give me insight and more understanding of the various philosophical issue in reading Bork along side Fish, in that it forced me to put apply certain value and ideas to an actual court case, and I came out understanding more side of an issue than just one narrow one. Please note that this sample paper on Reparations for Slavery is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Reparations for Slavery, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Reparations for Slavery will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Immorality in Television

If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Immorality in Television. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Immorality in Television paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Immorality in Television, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Immorality in Television paper at affordable prices with writing help service!

Vulgarity in Television In the early years of television people where much more sensitive to what was said and took offense to any form of obscene language. Even in the movies it was unacceptable. However, for many the standard for the use of vulgar language has expanded. In many shows on television vulgar words are used way to often. In many cases unnecessarily. These words do not bother me in the least. However, there are many parents with young children who are offended by this. This would not such a big deal if only the shows that carried these vulgarities would be shown later at night, as they where for many years. Also, most of the programs are not correctly rated to warn of there content.

Besides using the basics of the swear words some programs take it to a different level. Instead of using the words themselves they use a form of slang in order to get around the censors. Although these words are not the same as the ones commonly used, they do share the same meaning. By having these programs use these words they are encouraging the children to use a new language that there parents do not understand. And because the parents do not understand the words the children then think it is all right to use profanity.

Profanity in television is not so much a problem as it is an annoyance. It makes television more interesting to watch and can occasionally make a situation more humorous, but I do not enjoy it when a five-year-old calls their parents a-- holes to there face.

Rating System Recently introduced to all the television shows is the new rating system. This system was implemented to warn about the kind of shows on television. The system tells whether the show is to mature for young children. However, does the system still have flaws?

Cheap writing services for Immorality in Television papers

Although it does give an idea as to what the show contains, it does not tell as to the extent to which it is. An example would be the television show Strangers with Candy. This program is extremely crude with little humor. Normally I enjoy crude humor, but this show is gross. It contains vulgarity, drug use, and sexually references. And to top it off the show is at 1000. Shows like this should not be viewed any time. My point of bringing this up is to show how lose the system is. I believe that it should be remolded to a different, more precise version of what it is.

The current rating system is as follows TV-Y--This program is appropriate for all children. TV-Y7-- Directed to children age seven and above. May include mild physical or comedic violence, or may frighten children under age seven.

Categories for programs directed at entire audience TV-G-- Suitable for all ages. Contains little or no violence, no strong language and little or no sexual dialogue or situations. TV-PG.-- Parental Guidance Suggested. May contain infrequent coarse language, limited violence and some suggestive sexual dialogue and situations. TV-14-- Parents Strongly Cautioned. May contain sophisticated themes, sexual content, strong language and more intense violence. TV-M-- Mature Audiences Only. Unsuitable for children. May contain mature themes, profane language, graphic violence and explicit sexual content.

Sexually Themes and Drug Use The limitations of sex in television as far been expanded since when the television first became popular. In the past twenty years shows have been made which prove my point. Lately on television their has been much leniency towards this subject. Shows such as N.Y.P.D. Blues and Beverly Hills 010 constantly try to see how far the can take a situation before they agitate the censors. Once again it does not bother me to see these things, but when thinking about it I really would not approve of my younger sister to see these things.

Another blight on television would be the use of drugs. Unlike vulgarity and sex I really do have a problem with drug use. There is really no use for it on television and I would prefer to never see it. Although I am totally against it really do think that their is a difference between seeing someone spark a joint and watching them stick their arms with a dirty needle. It is my opinion that if young children see this they will become curious and want to experiment. And if this happens they will someday be eating a steady diet of government cheese and be living in a van down by the river.

Subliminal Messages in Television Although this subject is often overlooked it is a great cause for concern when it is exposed to young children. Subliminal messages can warp a young child's mind into thinking that they should do something that is subconsciously being placed into their minds. These thoughts are usually harmless. Most advertisers try to promote there product by either having an actor rapidly saying the products name or by constantly showing pictures of the product. By doing this they are sending messages toy young minds that they need to have what is their. A good example of this would be Pokemon. Because of all the publicity kids feel the need to have what is being shown. The result to this is parents going out and buying over one-hundred-fifty-one toys of little monsters that their children will forget about in a year. This is exactly what the advertisers want so they can put out another toy that will have kids begging their parents for money.

Violence in Television Probably the most talked about subject when it comes to bad-mouthing of television. This has become a serious problem in television. Even in the days of early television violence has been around. However, since those days it has become much worse. Instead of kids jumping of cliffs thinking they are superman, or hitting each-other over the head with a frying pan, they are hitting each-other over the head with a steel chair and choking out their friends like a wrestler. Their is no real place to put the blame because violence is every where. However, it does not need to be placed on television where it can be broadcast to anyone who wants to watch it.

Unlike the other topics I mentioned I do not think that by only moving the more violent programs to later at night would work. This is manly because it would be to difficult as to determine what is violent and what is not. By this I mean that people have different views as to what they find violent. Some people may find an angry dog chewing a small toy violent enough, while someone else finds decapitation is nothing to loose sleep over. Either way I believe that violence does influence the young mind, and unfortunatly thier is very little our society can do about it because we have let the situation get to far out of control.Please note that this sample paper on Immorality in Television is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Immorality in Television, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on Immorality in Television will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from writing help service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!